<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813</id><updated>2012-01-16T08:48:23.818-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Non-Dealing Desk Trader</title><subtitle type='html'>All you need to know about the global currency exchange market.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>60</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-5845746950859602954</id><published>2012-01-16T07:51:00.002-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-16T08:38:22.965-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Do your friends think you're funny?</title><summary type='text'>Learn how to take center stage perfecting your skills as a standup comic or public speaker. Sign up for the newsletter and you'll receive instant access to the only the industry's best stand-up comedy ebooks -- over 100 pages -- FOR FREE! Just Click Here!</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/5845746950859602954'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/5845746950859602954'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2012/01/do-your-friends-think-youre-funny.html' title='Do your friends think you&apos;re funny?'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-vONCiG2NdcU/TxRRk68lyVI/AAAAAAAAAF4/fmWwFji-3tA/s72-c/comedyu-qrcode-LARGE.png' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-7228923905520514746</id><published>2010-02-07T06:31:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2011-03-08T09:01:09.645-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Kicking Off the Forex Robots Scam Campaign</title><summary type='text'>Just thought I’d let my readers know that the NDD forum is active again. If you enjoyed the dealing vs non-dealing desk debate, you’re really going to love the in-your-face challenge we’re dealing with now. The issue? Gypsy programmers selling bogus forex robots. I know you’ve seen them and  they all look and sound alike. Here are but a few illustrations.God awful testimonials that read something</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/7228923905520514746'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/7228923905520514746'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2010/02/kicking-off-forex-robots-scam-campaign.html' title='Kicking Off the Forex Robots Scam Campaign'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_95U7-gMmlO0/S1x7ZQR_aiI/AAAAAAAAADE/-6QVMfSRMf8/s72-c/snake+oil+salesman.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-7525691265765169600</id><published>2009-12-31T11:44:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-06T10:40:56.527-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Ten Surefire Signs a Robot Developer is a Scammer</title><summary type='text'>If you’re thinking about buying a forex robot to automate your trading activities, you would be well advised to do a little homework. Here is a list of the top ten, surefire signs the robot being offered probably isn't worth the time that went into developing it.  1. The robot isn’t offered on a free trial basis. If the developer isn’t willing to allow you to back and forward test it using a demo</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/7525691265765169600'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/7525691265765169600'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2009/12/ten-surefire-signs-robot-developer-is.html' title='Ten Surefire Signs a Robot Developer is a Scammer'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_95U7-gMmlO0/Sz0L6T6rg8I/AAAAAAAAAC8/4ycADfTUdzw/s72-c/forex+robot.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-4165875203877877604</id><published>2009-10-19T14:57:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-06-07T08:30:14.110-07:00</updated><title type='text'>New Videos Thoroughly Document Why Traders Should Avoid Using Metatrader Like the Plague</title><summary type='text'>My readers have known for some time that I'm not a big proponent of Metatrader, a forex trading platform that I have contended for some time was originally designed for the benefit of the forex dealer, not the trader. It's by far the most popular trading platform in the forex dealer community and for one very good reason. The plaform provides dealers the means to skew markets to their own </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/4165875203877877604'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/4165875203877877604'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2009/10/stop-hunting-and-metatrader.html' title='New Videos Thoroughly Document Why Traders Should Avoid Using Metatrader Like the Plague'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-5584200713325285345</id><published>2009-09-18T14:36:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-09-20T07:59:22.282-07:00</updated><title type='text'>A Must Read for Traders: The Black Swan</title><summary type='text'>Regardless of the asset class traded, there are basically two types of traders - technical and fundamental - and neither group predicted the financial collapse, let alone its aftermath last Fall. The reason they didn't can be attributed to a shared lack of awareness. They failed to take into consideration a phenomenon Hassim refers to as "The Black Swan".  If you are a trader and aren't familiar </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/5584200713325285345'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/5584200713325285345'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2009/09/indispensible-reading-black-swan.html' title='A Must Read for Traders: The Black Swan'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-8667281277015447131</id><published>2009-09-05T07:50:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-09-05T08:19:40.257-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Fxspyder Puts an End to Targeted Stop Hunting</title><summary type='text'>As most of my readers know, my blog and the NDD Forum have been inactive the past few months largely because I came to the conclusion several months ago that they had pretty much outlived their central purpose - to educate traders and help bring about much needed industry reform. In the past year and a half we’ve witnessed a great deal of change. A number of forex dealers have moved to at lease </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/8667281277015447131'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/8667281277015447131'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2009/09/fxspyder-puts-end-to-targeted-stop.html' title='Fxspyder Puts an End to Targeted Stop Hunting'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_95U7-gMmlO0/R_ZSXF_u6jI/AAAAAAAAABc/ka-oNWrZksQ/s72-c/jack+back.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-7186187453299793117</id><published>2008-04-26T10:50:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-11-12T19:37:17.473-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Were ‘Learn Forex’ Fund Investors Blind or Just Stupid?</title><summary type='text'>Not surprisingly, a federal judge finally got around to sentencing a forex scam artist to nine years in prison yesterday.  In doing so he rejected the defendent's  request for home detention so he could try to pay $11 million in restitution by speculating in the foreign currency market. If you aren’t aware of it, the defendant, Garland E. Burrell, Jr., was the brains behind Learn: Forex, Inc., an</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/7186187453299793117'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/7186187453299793117'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2008/04/were-learn-forex-investors-blind-or.html' title='Were ‘Learn Forex’ Fund Investors Blind or Just Stupid?'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_95U7-gMmlO0/SBNvdtLNiGI/AAAAAAAAACE/F1GMjH6kFQw/s72-c/sign.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-2910480894038590751</id><published>2008-04-19T09:40:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2008-11-12T19:37:17.583-08:00</updated><title type='text'>FXLQ Down, Almost Out, But Won't Say 'Uncle'</title><summary type='text'>I can't help but wonder if the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) will pursue the principals at FXLQ, a forex dealer that was put into receivership early this year, for fraud. I’m no lawyer, but in reading The Report on Temporary Receiver’s Activities, there certainly appears to be a case for fraud because it appears the principals repeatedly misrepresented the company’s financial </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/2910480894038590751'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/2910480894038590751'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2008/04/who-is-robert-gray.html' title='FXLQ Down, Almost Out, But Won&apos;t Say &apos;Uncle&apos;'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_95U7-gMmlO0/SAojkFO3TKI/AAAAAAAAAB8/Ly2fNaWBPDU/s72-c/FXLQ.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-7027284899327648798</id><published>2008-04-19T09:06:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-11-12T19:37:17.694-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Refco's Ex-President Found Guilty on All Charges</title><summary type='text'>The jury is in. While of little consequence to the thousands of traders bilked by the principals at Refco, all of their trader clients must be getting some solace from the knowledge that Tone Grant was finally convicted on all charges at the U.S. District Court in Manhattan this week.  After months of testimony, it only took two days for the jury to return a verdict that found him guilty of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/7027284899327648798'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/7027284899327648798'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2008/04/refco-ex-president-found-guilty-on-all.html' title='Refco&apos;s Ex-President Found Guilty on All Charges'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_95U7-gMmlO0/SAof8VO3TJI/AAAAAAAAAB0/x4pDiAIzNds/s72-c/jail+cell.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-5577279113780707604</id><published>2008-04-10T18:38:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-11-12T19:37:17.888-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Divine Justice: What Goes Around, Comes Around</title><summary type='text'>As conspiracy theories go, the one you’re about to read about could provide one of the screen writers I talk with on an irregular basis fodder for a real thriller. In this story a geek develops a fool proof and virtually undetectable way to skim profits from his clients.  Whether you are a forex trader, knowledgeable programmer, or devotee of creative conspiracy theories, you’ve got to love the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/5577279113780707604'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/5577279113780707604'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2008/04/divine-justice-what-goes-around-comes.html' title='Divine Justice: What Goes Around, Comes Around'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_95U7-gMmlO0/R_7ByZd0MVI/AAAAAAAAABs/h1tFjpzA_Co/s72-c/attention_manipulation.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-7425728241219636115</id><published>2007-07-05T11:51:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2008-11-12T19:37:17.993-08:00</updated><title type='text'>FXCM Makes a Clever Attempt to Distance Itself from the Brotherhood of Market Makers but Fails Miserably</title><summary type='text'>FXCM (Forex Capital Markets) on July 3, 2007 issued a press release to announce that 99% of all their clients are now trading with “No Dealing Desk” execution (not to be confused with non-dealing desk trading). I'm guessing the shift didn’t happen because traders necessarily wanted it, but because FXCM decided that it was in FXCM’s best interests to put everyone on it. Up until a few weeks ago </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/7425728241219636115'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/7425728241219636115'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2007/07/fxcms-feeble-attempt-to-distance-itself.html' title='FXCM Makes a Clever Attempt to Distance Itself from the Brotherhood of Market Makers but Fails Miserably'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_95U7-gMmlO0/Ro1JFK4JlfI/AAAAAAAAAA8/GFrS3jP_F9I/s72-c/sorry.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-116783980218460643</id><published>2007-01-03T07:55:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-25T10:24:40.497-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Kicking Off the Forex Robots SCAM Campaign</title><summary type='text'>Just thought I’d let my readers know that the NDD forum is active again. If you enjoyed the dealing vs non-dealing desk debate, you’re really going to love the in-your-face challenge we’re dealing with now. The issue? Gypsy programmers selling bogus forex robots. I know you’ve seen them and  they all look and sound alike. Here are but a few illustrations.“I turned a profit of $50,212 in just one </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/116783980218460643'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/116783980218460643'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2007/01/think-youve-been-trading-forex-think.html' title='Kicking Off the Forex Robots SCAM Campaign'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_95U7-gMmlO0/S1x7ZQR_aiI/AAAAAAAAADE/-6QVMfSRMf8/s72-c/snake+oil+salesman.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-116284758194080395</id><published>2006-11-06T13:02:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-06-05T21:14:01.034-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Sharing An Advisory from an Experienced Forex Trader</title><summary type='text'>I received an email today from an experienced trader who made me realize that a lot of what I’ve been writing about lately probably goes over the head of the prospective and/or inexperienced trader. I thought I’d share it in hopes that it will encourage you do to stick around a while. Dear Phil,A fellow trader sent me an email the other day talking about Forex non-dealing desk brokerage and cited</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/116284758194080395'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/116284758194080395'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/11/sharing-advisory-from-experienced.html' title='Sharing An Advisory from an Experienced Forex Trader'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-116217077761042447</id><published>2006-10-29T17:04:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-07-30T09:45:36.522-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Complaint Registered with National Futures Association</title><summary type='text'>The following is a complaint I registered with the National Futures Association last week in hopes it will take action to require Forex brokers to provide a full and accurate disclosure when they offer "commission free" trading. As it stands today, their disclosures are misleading if not wholly inaccurate. A broker's source of income is not limited to the quoted spreads traders see on their </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/116217077761042447'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/116217077761042447'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/10/complaint-registered-with-national.html' title='Complaint Registered with National Futures Association'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-116146633689720545</id><published>2006-10-21T14:28:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-07-30T09:46:00.040-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Just How Safe Are the Funds Traders Have on Deposit?</title><summary type='text'>An on-going discussion on the forum has highlighted an issue that I’m sure is close to every trader’s heart. Just how secure are the funds the trader has on deposit with a Futures Commission Merchant (FCM) here in the United States? Here’s a summary I hope will not only be informative but put this concern in its proper perspective.  With respect to the security of one’s funds, there are at least </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/116146633689720545'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/116146633689720545'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/10/just-how-safe-are-funds-traders-have.html' title='Just How Safe Are the Funds Traders Have on Deposit?'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-116093499332800277</id><published>2006-10-15T10:37:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-07-30T09:46:22.730-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Perspective on FXCM's Involvement in Refco Litigation</title><summary type='text'>The following story by Laura du Preez appearing on a South African financial services website, Personal Finance, published just yesterday makes interesting reading in light of FXCM's recent initiative to help Refco traders recover their losses. Was (Is) the Leaderguard Recovery Unit interested in assisting defrauded traders or just protecting their own bippies?October 14, 2006 - Personal Finance </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/116093499332800277'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/116093499332800277'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/10/perspective-on-fxcms-involvement-in.html' title='Perspective on FXCM&apos;s Involvement in Refco Litigation'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-116043043674709028</id><published>2006-10-09T14:28:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-07-30T09:46:44.233-07:00</updated><title type='text'>TowerGroup Predicts Forex Trading Volume to Exceed $3 Trillion by 2007, Creating A New Business Model</title><summary type='text'>The following story appearing on Bobsguide today paints an interesting picture. Apparently, not only is the foreign exchange on its way to becoming a legitimate asset class all on its own, Towergroup believes that Electronic Communications Network (ECN) platforms are going to inevitably replace the "take it or leave it" platforms offered by traditional dealing desk brokers.  Bobsguide - October </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/116043043674709028'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/116043043674709028'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/10/towergroup-predicts-forex-trading.html' title='TowerGroup Predicts Forex Trading Volume to Exceed $3 Trillion by 2007, Creating A New Business Model'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115982466020765869</id><published>2006-10-02T14:27:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-07-30T09:47:05.140-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Is FXCM Trying to Avoid a Silver Bullet?</title><summary type='text'>A recent Associated Press (AP) story reveals that Refco Inc.'s retail foreign-exchange customers have teamed up with Forex Trading LLC (FXCM) in a new lawsuit that seeks the return of at least $10 million from the company, which declared  bankruptcy on October 17, 2005. What makes this interesting to me is that trader plaintiffs were joined in the lawsuit by FXCM, a former business partner of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115982466020765869'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115982466020765869'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/10/is-fxcm-trying-to-avoid-silver-bullet.html' title='Is FXCM Trying to Avoid a Silver Bullet?'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115929462338993570</id><published>2006-09-26T11:14:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-07-30T09:47:26.403-07:00</updated><title type='text'>CME/Reuters Update: A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?</title><summary type='text'>When the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) and Reuters announced they were putting their heads together to provide a  standardized, anonymous and transparent Forex trading platform, I was excited by the prospect because, at least  conceptually, such a platform would eliminate a lot of the game playing that goes on at the broker level.  I was somewhat taken aback, therefore, when I came across the</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115929462338993570'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115929462338993570'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/09/cmereuters-update-wolf-in-sheeps.html' title='CME/Reuters Update: A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115842858396642607</id><published>2006-09-16T10:42:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-06-05T21:16:52.481-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Confessions of a Marketmaker (Dealing Desk Broker)</title><summary type='text'>Pupkinus, a member of The NDD Forum, sure is making my work a lot easier. He posted a commentary today about a post by an Australian dealing desk broker who gave Forexfactory members a look into the inner workings of the brokerage community. It's a real eye-opener and well worth republishing. Broker: We also were a marketmaker with our clients. In fact most major Investment Banks are. Contrary, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115842858396642607'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115842858396642607'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/09/confessions-of-marketmaker-dealing.html' title='Confessions of a Marketmaker (Dealing Desk Broker)'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115783199197387966</id><published>2006-09-09T12:50:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-07-30T09:48:17.418-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Trading Tips &amp; Tricks from an NDD Forum Member</title><summary type='text'>The following was posted by Pupkinus, one of The NDD Forum's more active members. I'm reposting it on the blog because it offers a lot of useful advice to prospect traders. If you would like to comment, you'll find the original post in the Dealing Desk Broker forum.  Thought some tips &amp; tricks derived from my personal experience and experience of other traders may help somebody. I promised </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115783199197387966'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115783199197387966'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/09/trading-tips-tricks-from-ndd-forum.html' title='Trading Tips &amp; Tricks from an NDD Forum Member'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115722759575256340</id><published>2006-09-02T13:00:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-06-05T21:17:46.223-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Global vs Targeted Stop Hunting (Stop Phishing)</title><summary type='text'>For those unfamiliar with the practice of stop hunting, I thought it might be helpful to distinguish between global stop hunting and targeted ones. One is a function of the free market, the other constitutes unadulterated manipulation. Banks who feed quotes to FCMs don't target specific trader positions unless the trader has signed up to trade through the bank's dealing desk. For the most part </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115722759575256340'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115722759575256340'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/09/global-vs-targeted-stop-hunting-stop.html' title='Global vs Targeted Stop Hunting (Stop Phishing)'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115619903276490667</id><published>2006-08-21T15:19:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-07-30T09:48:36.363-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Primary Advantage to Non-Dealing Desk Trading</title><summary type='text'>This morning I published a post to the NDD forum this morning and I think it bears repeating so I’m republishing it on the blog this afternoon. I hope visitors find it useful and informative.Non-Dealing Desk Trading: The Primary AdvantageAfter reading a number of posts to the forum and a recent article in the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) I’m having to step back to re-examine the advantages / </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115619903276490667'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115619903276490667'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/08/primary-advantage-to-non-dealing-desk.html' title='The Primary Advantage to Non-Dealing Desk Trading'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115593656933044214</id><published>2006-08-18T14:22:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-06-05T21:18:39.750-07:00</updated><title type='text'>An Action Plan to Put an End to Broker Stop Hunting</title><summary type='text'>Visit any Forex forum and you’ll see a thread or two about stop hunting (stop fishing) but little or nothing ever gets done about it. Why? First, most traders wouldn’t recognize a stop hunt if they saw one. More importantly, when individual traders do recognize they’ve been stopped out they do little or nothing to call the broker to account for its actions beyond making a demand for personal </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115593656933044214'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115593656933044214'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/08/action-plan-to-put-end-to-broker-stop.html' title='An Action Plan to Put an End to Broker Stop Hunting'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115549540290319482</id><published>2006-08-13T11:42:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-06-05T21:19:09.589-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Forex Training: A Ripoff by Any Name Is Still a Ripoff</title><summary type='text'>I woke up this morning to a half hour infomercial hyping a “new” Forex trading program and I couldn’t help shake my head and smile when I realized that it’s really 4xMadeEasy in drag - a new name (Premier Trade), a slick summer dress and a new pair of shiny shoes. How do I know this? 1. The company’s spokesman is none other than James Dicks, the “founder” of 4xMadeEasy. Be sure to read the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115549540290319482'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115549540290319482'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/08/forex-training-ripoff-by-any-name-is.html' title='Forex Training: A Ripoff by Any Name Is Still a Ripoff'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115506892192041893</id><published>2006-08-08T13:23:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-06-05T21:19:34.538-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Frequent Flyer vs Frequent Trading Incentive Programs</title><summary type='text'>Just when one would think the industry is starting to wise up, along comes another FCM with an offer to supposedly “bailout” the unfortunate traders who took it in the shorts when Refco went belly up. The offer, of course, is no more inviting than the one offered by Gain Capital Group, an offer that collapsed a few days ago. And it’s not one that’s restricted to Refco traders either. It’s </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115506892192041893'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115506892192041893'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/08/frequent-flyer-vs-frequent-trading.html' title='Frequent Flyer vs Frequent Trading Incentive Programs'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115470827332684148</id><published>2006-08-04T09:09:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-06-05T21:20:01.320-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Since 1982, Just Exactly What Has the NFA Done to Protect Traders from Unscrupulous Dealers?</title><summary type='text'>The other day I came across a comment from a trader on a forum who stated in no uncertain terms that traders should avoid Forex brokers who aren’t registered with the National Futures Association (NFA) and it got me to thinking. What has the NFA done for traders lately? So I spent the better part of a working day examining the complaints they filed against various Futures Commission Merchants (</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115470827332684148'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115470827332684148'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/08/since-1982-just-exactly-what-has-nfa.html' title='Since 1982, Just Exactly What Has the NFA Done to Protect Traders from Unscrupulous Dealers?'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115448277900257673</id><published>2006-08-01T18:33:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-06-05T21:21:00.127-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Keep In Mind Stop Losses Are Not Guaranteed</title><summary type='text'>It’s unfortunate that a lot of new traders are under the impression that the placement of a stop loss enables them absolutely control their losses. Such is not the case. There are times when the market is moving so quickly that a stop loss cannot be filled and this can spell financial disaster for the trader with limited resources.Am I suggesting that one shouldn’t trade the Forex? Certainly not,</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115448277900257673'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115448277900257673'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/08/keep-in-mind-stop-losses-are-not.html' title='Keep In Mind Stop Losses Are Not Guaranteed'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115402746892753217</id><published>2006-07-27T11:41:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-06-05T21:21:33.287-07:00</updated><title type='text'>No Surprise: Gain Capital’s Sweetheart Deal Goes Sour</title><summary type='text'>Refco announced today that the deal they had worked out with Gain Capital Group “has been jointly terminated.” I suspect the decision has less to do with the purchase agreement, than it did the adjournment to allow ... objecting parties more time to assess the so called “benefits of the transaction.” Here’s the formal announcement.Refco Inc. (OTC: RFXCQ) said today that the proposed agreement </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115402746892753217'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115402746892753217'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/07/no-surprise-gain-capitals-sweetheart.html' title='No Surprise: Gain Capital’s Sweetheart Deal Goes Sour'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115386393969637840</id><published>2006-07-25T14:42:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-06-05T21:21:56.920-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Broker Refund Falls Short of Reasonable Expectations</title><summary type='text'>This morning I received an email from a trader in Arizona and I thought I’d share it with everyone. The writer recounts a trading experience that brings up a fascinating question.“Last month I was helping my younger brother trade the payroll data for the first time. [To make a long story] short he got in late ..... and ended up putting in a market order to buy at ... 1.8510..... three seconds </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115386393969637840'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115386393969637840'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/07/broker-refund-falls-short-of.html' title='Broker Refund Falls Short of Reasonable Expectations'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115326215175361544</id><published>2006-07-18T15:28:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-06-05T21:22:22.189-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Good News? Maybe Not, But One Can Always Hope</title><summary type='text'>The past two weeks I’ve received several emails from Trader Dan asking me what I think of the initiative being take by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) and (Reuters) to create a global clearing house that promises to provide greater  transparency and anonymity to the foreign currency exchange market. Here are the initial announcements that peaked his interest and mine. The $50 million </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115326215175361544'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115326215175361544'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/07/good-news-maybe-not-but-one-can-always.html' title='Good News? Maybe Not, But One Can Always Hope'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115315061969886108</id><published>2006-07-17T08:36:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-06-05T21:22:47.896-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Don't Kid Yourself. Until Profits Are Actually Deposited In Your Personal Bank Account It's All Funny Money</title><summary type='text'>I received a fascinating email yesterday from a reader who belongs to a trader group whose moderator took some time to relay the substance of a prolonged conversation with the CEO of one of the better known Forex brokerage firms. From that email I gathered an interesting note,  a twist on a common analogy between the Forex trader and the gambler.  Dealers, like casinos, are in the game for the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115315061969886108'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115315061969886108'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/07/dont-kid-yourself-until-profits-are.html' title='Don&apos;t Kid Yourself. Until Profits Are Actually Deposited In Your Personal Bank Account It&apos;s All Funny Money'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115282107563536376</id><published>2006-07-13T12:52:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-06-05T21:23:12.406-07:00</updated><title type='text'>An Attempt to Eliminate the Blue Smoke and Mirrors</title><summary type='text'>Those who have been following my blog and conversing with me via email know that I’ve been reluctant to provide specific guidance with respect to non-dealing desk brokers because I wanted to preserve the blog’s non-commercial nature.. Since it went public I’ve received a significant number of emails from traders wanting more information and have avoided giving specific advice. Clearly, I am not </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115282107563536376'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115282107563536376'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/07/attempt-to-eliminate-blue-smoke-and.html' title='An Attempt to Eliminate the Blue Smoke and Mirrors'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115212778803805864</id><published>2006-07-05T12:23:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2012-01-16T08:48:23.844-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Is InterbankFX Running a Dealing or Non-Dealing Desk?</title><summary type='text'>A couple of months ago I posted a warning to traders to be wary of FCMs offering non-dealing desk brokerage services to mini and micro-mini account holders. It appears my suspicions have been further validated by an insider who talks about the inner workings of InterbankFx, a brokerage firm that claims to be running a non-dealing desk.  If you are trading currencies - especially trading mini’s or</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115212778803805864'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115212778803805864'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/07/is-interbankfx-running-dealing-or-non.html' title='Is InterbankFX Running a Dealing or Non-Dealing Desk?'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-vONCiG2NdcU/TxRRk68lyVI/AAAAAAAAAF4/fmWwFji-3tA/s72-c/comedyu-qrcode-LARGE.png' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115178029674385237</id><published>2006-07-01T11:41:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-06-05T21:24:15.576-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Is Gain Capital Group Negotiating a Sweetheart Deal?</title><summary type='text'>According to Reuters, Refco, the forex brokerage firm that filed for bankruptcy last October, reported yesterday that it has reached a preliminary agreement to sell its retail foreign exchange customer accounts to Gain Capital Group for $2.5 million. The deal which would bring an estimated 15,000 additional traders to Forex.com, Gain's dealing desk subsidiary, is subject to a bankruptcy judge’s </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115178029674385237'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115178029674385237'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/07/is-gain-capital-group-negotiating.html' title='Is Gain Capital Group Negotiating a Sweetheart Deal?'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115118329616954455</id><published>2006-06-24T14:06:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-06-05T21:24:52.841-07:00</updated><title type='text'>4x Made Easy®: A Scam or Legitimate Path to Riches?</title><summary type='text'>A few days ago I received an email from a reader who is participating in a 4x Made Easy® (4xME) trading group in Los Angeles. For those unfamiliar with the company offering 4xME, GlobalTec Solutions, represents itself as a Forex software, trading and training provider. Judging from the number of people who belong to Yahoo’s 4xMadeEasy eGroup (8,846 members and counting), the company  has </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115118329616954455'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115118329616954455'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/06/4x-made-easy-scam-or-legitimate-path.html' title='4x Made Easy®: A Scam or Legitimate Path to Riches?'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115110612243311588</id><published>2006-06-23T16:36:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-06-24T05:52:54.293-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Not Using Stop Losses? What’s Your Contingency Plan?</title><summary type='text'>Last night I found myself chatting with a few folks online about the comparative merits of Forex non-dealing and dealing desk brokerage when the conversation turned to a discussion of stop losses - whether to use them or not. One trader asked those in attendance if anyone was trading without using them. Another responded in the affirmative.  The exchange that ensued was quite informative so I </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115110612243311588'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115110612243311588'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/06/not-using-stop-losses-whats-your.html' title='Not Using Stop Losses? What’s Your Contingency Plan?'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115075546166542197</id><published>2006-06-19T15:14:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-06-20T04:31:31.473-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Taking a Stab at Calculating Mini Forex Trading Losses</title><summary type='text'>An email I received from an unsuccessful trader yesterday got me to thinking about the daily losses spot traders are suffering so I did a little research. Admittedly, I’m no statistician so if anyone can help quantify these loss projections, I’m all ears. Drop me an email and I’ll do my best to correct the numbers and assumptions I’m about to blither on about. Please cite authoritative sources if</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115075546166542197'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115075546166542197'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/06/taking-stab-at-calculating-mini-forex.html' title='Taking a Stab at Calculating Mini Forex Trading Losses'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115050177553813034</id><published>2006-06-16T16:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-06-23T16:47:24.430-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Painting All Dealing Desk Brokers with a Broad Brush?</title><summary type='text'>I received an email a few days ago from a reader who thought it was unfair to paint one of the dealing desk brokers listed in this blog with the dark color being used to paint everyone else. To that I will simply say this. If any dealing desk broker is concerned about being lumped together with the unscrupulous, then it’s that broker’s responsibility to start educating their  trader clients </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115050177553813034'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115050177553813034'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/06/painting-all-dealing-desk-brokers-with.html' title='Painting All Dealing Desk Brokers with a Broad Brush?'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-115022672463750084</id><published>2006-06-13T12:24:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-04-19T11:47:44.017-07:00</updated><title type='text'>In Response to a Continuing Flow of Requests</title><summary type='text'>Since I continue to get requests from traders wanting to know who is offering a non-dealing desk trading platform, the thought has occurred to me that I could be making millions as an introducing broker but that creates a bit of a dilemma. When I decided to publish this blog, I made a promise to myself to create a non-commercial platform traders could rely on to get the straight skinny. As it </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115022672463750084'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/115022672463750084'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/06/in-response-to-continuing-flow-of.html' title='In Response to a Continuing Flow of Requests'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114986275508739747</id><published>2006-06-09T07:15:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2012-01-16T08:45:43.581-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Are Dealing Desk Brokers Starting to Get Nervous?</title><summary type='text'>Cruising a number of forums today I discovered the following post by a senior member of a forum (I suspect a broker or principal of the forum’s sponsor) named Pipster. It could have been written by me late last summer when I was still operating under the illusion that trading through a dealing desk brokerage house like FXCM, FxStreet, or Oanda, I was actually trading the Forex.  That malady was </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114986275508739747'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114986275508739747'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/06/are-dealing-desk-brokers-starting-to.html' title='Are Dealing Desk Brokers Starting to Get Nervous?'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-vONCiG2NdcU/TxRRk68lyVI/AAAAAAAAAF4/fmWwFji-3tA/s72-c/comedyu-qrcode-LARGE.png' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114968347205113381</id><published>2006-06-07T05:30:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-04-19T11:48:08.728-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Dealing Desk Brokers Use Deceptive Advertising to Attract Naive Traders - NFA Struggling to Stop It</title><summary type='text'>I'm not posting this today because I think most Forex traders are taken in by the nonsensical propostion that there is such a thing as "commission free" forex trading, but the National Futures Association (NFA) seems to think that a large enough number of Forex traders are being taken in by the appeal because it has disciplined at least one dealing desk broker who used and continues to use that </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114968347205113381'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114968347205113381'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/06/dealing-desk-brokers-use-deceptive.html' title='Dealing Desk Brokers Use Deceptive Advertising to Attract Naive Traders - NFA Struggling to Stop It'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114954098594141973</id><published>2006-06-05T13:55:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-06-23T15:07:39.453-07:00</updated><title type='text'>More on the Hazards of Managed Accounts: S.A. Ombud Holds Referring Forex Broker's Feet to the Fire</title><summary type='text'>In what could be the first of many more determinations, Charles Pillai, the Ombud for Financial Services Providers in South Africa, has ruled against a broker who sold investments in Leaderguard, a Forex managed account service provider, to a pensioner. The ruling which held the referring broker liable for the misdeeds of the broker they referred this particular client to could very well be the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114954098594141973'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114954098594141973'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/06/more-on-hazards-of-managed-accounts-sa.html' title='More on the Hazards of Managed Accounts: S.A. Ombud Holds Referring Forex Broker&apos;s Feet to the Fire'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114935093652115315</id><published>2006-06-03T08:55:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-06-23T14:59:56.406-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Change of Pace: Capitalism as Seen Around the World</title><summary type='text'>I stumbled on the following description of corporate thinking and thought I'd share it with everyone. It really doesn't have anything to do with foreign exchange trading but the author, Peter Gooch, a broadcast journalist, has a rye sense of humor. The story first appeared on ABC Queensland July 26, 2002 and has been cited without attribution by traders on a couple of Forex related forums.  </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114935093652115315'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114935093652115315'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/06/change-of-pace-capitalism-as-seen.html' title='Change of Pace: Capitalism as Seen Around the World'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114909297969485902</id><published>2006-05-31T09:27:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-04-19T07:23:07.239-07:00</updated><title type='text'>More on Boredom: Is It the Underlying Cause of Trader Failure? One Experienced Trader Seems to Think So.</title><summary type='text'>Ran into a fellow day trader at the Farmer’s Market off Fairfax this morning and she joined me for breakfast. (Not a date or anything. She’s in her early 30s and I’m, well, old enough to be her grandfather.) Anyway, after an exchange of pleasantries and family news, we got to talking shop and the discussion turned to my blog, specifically the study I alluded to regarding trader behavior which </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114909297969485902'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114909297969485902'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/05/more-on-boredom-is-it-underlying-cause.html' title='More on Boredom: Is It the Underlying Cause of Trader Failure? One Experienced Trader Seems to Think So.'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114831780997603080</id><published>2006-05-22T10:08:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-04-19T11:48:52.102-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Looking for Easy Answers? You Won't Get Them Here</title><summary type='text'>Every other day or so I get an email from a trader (or prospective trader) requesting the name or names of one or more non-trading, non-dealing desk brokers. Those who have read through my entire blog know that providing that information would turn this blog into a commercial project and that’s just not something I’m going to allow to happen. To my way of thinking there’s even a better reason not</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114831780997603080'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114831780997603080'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/05/looking-for-easy-answers-you-wont-get.html' title='Looking for Easy Answers? You Won&apos;t Get Them Here'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114789463240766345</id><published>2006-05-17T12:35:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-06-11T18:21:07.766-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Succcessful Forex Trading May Be As Much a Function of Self-Knowledge As It Is Technical Understanding</title><summary type='text'>Visiting an Indian casino to eat dinner and play a little blackjack the other night, I got to thinking that a lack of education isn’t the only challenge facing Forex traders. Maybe, just maybe the biggest problem is human frailty - the abiding, perhaps genic disposition in some to believe there’s an easy way to riches, that the accumulation of wealth is a matter of good luck rather than hard </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114789463240766345'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114789463240766345'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/05/succcessful-forex-trading-may-be-as.html' title='Succcessful Forex Trading May Be As Much a Function of Self-Knowledge As It Is Technical Understanding'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114773063089665657</id><published>2006-05-15T14:56:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-06-23T14:50:59.496-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Newest Scam: Off-Shore, Forex Gambling Sites</title><summary type='text'>Last week I received an email from yet another Forex provider but didn’t get around to visiting the company’s website until this morning.  Believe it or not, there’s a company out there that is actually promoting Forex as a simplified gambling venue, offering “members” the ability to “bet” on currency trends. Without mentioning the company which, of course, would violate the non-commercial nature</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114773063089665657'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114773063089665657'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/05/newest-scam-off-shore-forex-gambling.html' title='The Newest Scam: Off-Shore, Forex Gambling Sites'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114728881549808965</id><published>2006-05-10T12:07:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-05-15T17:37:46.903-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Oh Dear, Me Thinks We Exposed a Raw Nerve Here</title><summary type='text'>As you may have noticed, I’ve disabled comments. The vast majority that have been posted lately have been flames which leads me to suspect there’s an organized effort on the part of dealing desk brokers to get me to feel bad about myself. If you have a comment feel free to drop me an email. It’s easier to manage an inbox delete button than editing comments from people who prefer to attack me than</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114728881549808965'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114728881549808965'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/05/oh-dear-me-thinks-we-exposed-raw-nerve.html' title='Oh Dear, Me Thinks We Exposed a Raw Nerve Here'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114722183195214909</id><published>2006-05-09T17:41:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-06-24T10:32:07.706-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Mini Non-Dealing Desks: Just The Latest Shenanigan?</title><summary type='text'>I’ve  received a number of emails from traders wanting to know where they can go to take advantage of a non-dealing desk and realized that I have been remiss in mentioning that I have yet to confirm that any broker is offering mini traders access to the market through a non-dealing desk at least at this time. To trade through a non-dealing desk one has to trade standard lots and that currently </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114722183195214909'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114722183195214909'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/05/mini-non-dealing-desks-just-latest.html' title='Mini Non-Dealing Desks: Just The Latest Shenanigan?'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114713921912032129</id><published>2006-05-08T18:41:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2007-02-21T11:30:07.963-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Still Another Insight from Our Forex Insider</title><summary type='text'>According to our programming insider, about four months ago a couple of dealing desk Futures Commodity Merchants, specifically dealing desk brokers, conducted a joint, private study of Forex trader behavior. What they came up with only confirms what David Hannum, owner of the Cardiff Giant, one of PT Barnum's competitors said - "There's a sucker born every minute."  1. 98% of dealing desk traders</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114713921912032129'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114713921912032129'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/05/still-another-insight-from-our-forex.html' title='Still Another Insight from Our Forex Insider'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114703477633923618</id><published>2006-05-07T13:44:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-06-23T14:48:56.553-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Do Successful Traders Share a Common Temperament?</title><summary type='text'>During a conversation with a fellow trader last night, we got to talking about the emotional component of Forex trading and ended up agreeing that one’s temperament is a pretty good measure of probable success. In the course of the conversation he brought up an interesting question and it was simply this. Which of the characters in the comedy series Seinfeld would have a natural trading advantage</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114703477633923618'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114703477633923618'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/05/do-successful-traders-share-common.html' title='Do Successful Traders Share a Common Temperament?'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114694574274892502</id><published>2006-05-06T13:01:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2012-01-16T08:46:54.749-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Spiking: Fact of Forex Life? If So, It's Hard to Prove</title><summary type='text'>Anyone who has been trading the Forex for any length of time can’t help but have heard rumors  about “spiking” or “stop loss phishing”, but no one in the industry that I know of has been willing to come forward to clear the air, at least until now. According to at least one source, investor stop loss orders are frequently taken out not because the market has turned but because such takeouts serve</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114694574274892502'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114694574274892502'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/05/spiking-fact-of-forex-life-if-so-its.html' title='Spiking: Fact of Forex Life? If So, It&apos;s Hard to Prove'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-vONCiG2NdcU/TxRRk68lyVI/AAAAAAAAAF4/fmWwFji-3tA/s72-c/comedyu-qrcode-LARGE.png' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114658884453280943</id><published>2006-05-02T09:39:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-06-23T15:04:55.713-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Pet Peeve: Websites Selling the Dream of Easy Riches</title><summary type='text'>I’d be hard pressed to imagine how any prospective trader, looking for educational materials, could avoid stumbling on to at least one website offering trading secrets and systems that will enable the small investor the means to amass an incredible fortune trading the forex in a very short period of time. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission and National Futures Association are trying to find</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114658884453280943'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114658884453280943'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/05/pet-peeve-websites-selling-dream-of.html' title='Pet Peeve: Websites Selling the Dream of Easy Riches'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114627460756196722</id><published>2006-04-28T18:25:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-04-19T11:50:35.601-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Forex Fraud Frequently Related to Managed Accounts</title><summary type='text'>Anyone taking the time to check the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC’s) website will soon discover that the Forex affords the unscrupulous a relatively easy way to take advantage of the unsophisticated investor, especially when it comes to managed accounts. The following CFTC findings are only a small sampling of the problem the CFTC has uncovered.  Fx.unigma.com &amp; Fx-world.comCarlos </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114627460756196722'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114627460756196722'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/04/forex-fraud-frequently-related-to.html' title='Forex Fraud Frequently Related to Managed Accounts'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114597683479379220</id><published>2006-04-25T07:37:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-06-23T16:23:05.173-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Traders May be Well Advised to Rethink Doing Business with Forex Brokers and/or Banks in Switzerland</title><summary type='text'>Today an interesting story entitled Conspiracy Theory appeared on 7days.ae, a United Arab Emirates website that details the problems investors have been having getting their assets unfrozen in a Swiss bank. Should the story be true (I have no reason to think that it isn't), it should make anyone think twice about dealing with a Forex broker whose accounts are held by a  bank in Switzerland. You </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114597683479379220'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114597683479379220'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/04/traders-may-be-well-advised-to-rethink.html' title='Traders May be Well Advised to Rethink Doing Business with Forex Brokers and/or Banks in Switzerland'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114592187087766923</id><published>2006-04-24T16:34:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-04-19T11:51:04.663-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Beware of Websites Selling Forex Trading Systems that Guarantee High Profits and/or Minimal Risk</title><summary type='text'>The United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the federal agency that regulates commodity futures and options markets in the United States, has witnessed an increase in the number of Internet websites fraudulently promoting foreign exchange (Forex) trading systems and advisory services. Among other things, the websites they are concerned about lead prospective investors to </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114592187087766923'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114592187087766923'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/04/beware-of-websites-selling-forex.html' title='Beware of Websites Selling Forex Trading Systems that Guarantee High Profits and/or Minimal Risk'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114563283040043372</id><published>2006-04-21T07:57:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-04-19T11:51:19.810-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Advantages of Trading Through A Dealing Desk Broker</title><summary type='text'>In all fairness, I thought it would be a good idea to provide space for speculators to post the reasons they believe traders should use or continue to a dealing deak broker to trade the Forex. Anyone interested in modifying or making an addition to the list can ether drop me an email or post the recommendation in the comments section below and I'll be happy to post them.ADVANTAGES OF USING MY </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114563283040043372'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114563283040043372'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/04/advantages-of-trading-through-dealing.html' title='Advantages of Trading Through A Dealing Desk Broker'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114563114646437668</id><published>2006-04-21T07:52:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2012-01-16T08:44:08.597-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Non-Dealing Desk: Advantages and Disadvantages</title><summary type='text'>Over the past six months I've learned a lot about Forex trading platforms - the good and the bad. I hope this post, describing the advantages and disadvantages of non-dealing desk (non-trading desk) brokerage, will help clear the air. While certainly not comprehensive, I think the following hits the high points. ADVANTAGES OF THE NON-DEALING DESK1. No Inherent Conflict of Interest. Non-dealing </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114563114646437668'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114563114646437668'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/04/non-dealing-desk-advantages-and_21.html' title='The Non-Dealing Desk: Advantages and Disadvantages'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-vONCiG2NdcU/TxRRk68lyVI/AAAAAAAAAF4/fmWwFji-3tA/s72-c/comedyu-qrcode-LARGE.png' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26126813.post-114538481460887363</id><published>2006-04-18T11:25:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-01-25T10:26:35.958-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Kicking Off the Forex Robots SCAM Campaign</title><summary type='text'>Just thought I’d let my readers know that the NDD forum is active again. If you enjoyed the dealing vs non-dealing desk debate, you’re really going to love the in-your-face challenge we’re dealing with now. The issue? Gypsy programmers selling bogus forex robots. I know you’ve seen them and  they all look and sound alike. Here are but a few illustrations.“I turned a profit of $50,212 in just one </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114538481460887363'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26126813/posts/default/114538481460887363'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://nondealingdesk.blogspot.com/2006/04/think-youve-been-trading-forex-maybe.html' title='Kicking Off the Forex Robots SCAM Campaign'/><author><name>Phil Davis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09855782247211994858</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_95U7-gMmlO0/S1x7ZQR_aiI/AAAAAAAAADE/-6QVMfSRMf8/s72-c/snake+oil+salesman.jpg' height='72' width='72'/></entry></feed>
